Unlock the Editor’s Digest at no cost
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly e-newsletter.
Trafigura used dozens of “excessive threat” middlemen to clean enterprise offers in growing international locations, the Swiss courtroom making an attempt the corporate for bribery heard on Friday.
The corporate reached a “tipping level” in 2019 when issues over corruption outweighed the business advantages of such “intermediaries”, Michael Firth, Trafigura’s deputy head of compliance who has been within the division since 2010, instructed Swiss judges.
Many have been arrange by former Trafigura workers and have been used to assist the corporate unlock invaluable buying and selling alternatives in politically troubled or sophisticated international locations, the courtroom heard.
Trafigura’s compliance division had at all times thought-about the usage of such preparations to be “excessive threat”, Firth mentioned. “There have been issues round bribery and corruption,” he mentioned, when pressed by judges.
The commodity buying and selling group is on trial at Switzerland’s federal legal courtroom this week in a case centred on its profitable push into Angola between 2009 and 2011, through which a clutch of such middleman contractors performed a vital position.
Switzerland has by no means put a commodity dealer within the dock earlier than. Trafigura, which runs a lot of its enterprise from the nation, is a big of the worldwide business, with group revenues of $244bn final yr.
The case can be the primary worldwide the place expenses have been introduced in opposition to a prime government from the sector: Mike Wainwright, who was Trafigura’s chief working officer till April, is co-accused by Swiss prosecutors.
They allege the corporate paid more than €5mn of bribes via third events to an Angolan authorities official in change for oil bunkerage and transport contracts price greater than $143.7mn in earnings.
Attorneys for Trafigura have argued there isn’t a proof to attach the corporate or Wainwright to the choice to pay the alleged bribes. They’ve raised questions concerning the reliability of the prosecution’s proof — and the truth that key figures within the alleged bribery chain haven’t been indicted or summoned as witnesses.
The trial has pored over contracts and funds between DT Buying and selling, Trafigura’s collectively owned African subsidiary run by Mariano Ferraz, nicknamed “Mr Angola”; Consultco, an middleman run by a former Trafigura dealer Thierry Plojoux; and Wyland, an offshore company shell, the authorized beneficiary of which prosecutors allege was the Angolan authorities official Paulo Gouveia Junior.
Trafigura’s legal professionals are looking for to reveal that the corporate had strong compliance mechanisms in place on the time and did all it was required to stop unlawful funds from occurring.
They don’t dispute that cash could have been paid to Wyland by Consultco, which was their key middleman in Angola, however say Trafigura had no data of such funds being made.
Trafigura’s former chief monetary officer Pierre Lorinet instructed the courtroom on Thursday that funds from DT Buying and selling to Consultco had not raised any “red flags”.
Firth instructed judges that Trafigura had about 50 such middleman preparations worldwide in 2010. In his expertise, he mentioned, they have been rigorously scrutinised with “enhanced” compliance checks.
“We have been conscious that the bribery and corruption threat in Angola was excessive,” he mentioned.
Over time the authorized and reputational dangers of utilizing such middlemen grew, he mentioned.
“I imagine there got here a tipping level, the place the intermediaries have been considered as excessive threat, and in the meantime Trafigura was by then fairly nicely established within the international locations [they operated in] so there wasn’t the identical want for them.”
Trafigura’s give attention to compliance was continually growing over the interval he labored for the corporate, Firth mentioned. After 2011, the corporate went from performing repeat due diligence checks on key counterparties deemed excessive threat each three years to yearly, he added.
Giving evidence to the court earlier within the week, Wainwright mentioned he didn’t imagine any of Trafigura’s intermediaries to have acted corruptly in his expertise.
The choice to chop relationships with them, he mentioned, was primarily attributable to stress from banks lending Trafigura cash.
The trial continues subsequent week.
