Unlock the Editor’s Digest without cost
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly e-newsletter.
The variety of energetic enterprise capital buyers has dropped greater than 1 / 4 from a peak in 2021, as risk-averse monetary establishments focus their cash on the largest companies in Silicon Valley.
The tally of VCs investing in US-headquartered firms dropped to six,175 in 2024 — that means greater than 2,000 have fallen dormant since a peak of 8,315 in 2021, in response to knowledge supplier PitchBook.
The pattern has concentrated energy amongst a small group of mega-firms and has left smaller VCs in a struggle for survival. It has additionally skewed the dynamics of the US enterprise market, enabling start-ups reminiscent of SpaceX, OpenAI, Databricks and Stripe to remain personal for much longer, whereas scaling down funding choices for smaller firms.

Greater than half of the $71bn raised by US VCs in 2024 was pulled in by simply 9 companies, in response to PitchBook. Normal Catalyst, Andreessen Horowitz, Iconiq Progress and Thrive Capital raised greater than $25bn in 2024.
Many companies threw within the towel in 2024. Countdown Capital, an early-stage tech investor, introduced it could wind down and return uninvested capital to its backers in January. Foundry Group, an 18-year-old VC with about $3.5bn in property below administration, stated a $500mn fund raised in 2022 could be its final.
“There’s completely a VC consolidation,” stated John Chambers, former chief government of Cisco and the founding father of start-up funding agency JC2 Ventures.
“The massive guys [like] Andreessen Horowitz, Sequoia [Capital], Iconiq, Lightspeed [Venture Partners] and NEA shall be superb and can proceed,” he stated. However he added that these enterprise capitalists who didn’t safe massive returns in a low-interest charge surroundings earlier than 2021 have been going to wrestle as “that is going to be a more durable market”.
One issue is a dramatic slowdown in preliminary public choices and takeovers — the everyday milestones at which buyers money out of start-ups. That has staunched the move of capital from VCs again to their “restricted companions” — buyers reminiscent of pension funds, foundations and different establishments.

“The time to return capital has elongated rather a lot throughout the business over the past 25 years,” stated an LP in various giant US enterprise companies. “Within the Nineties it in all probability took seven years to get your a refund. Now it’s in all probability extra like 10 years.”
Some LPs have run out of persistence. The $71bn raised by US companies in 2024 is a seven-year low and fewer than two-fifths the entire haul in 2021.
Smaller, youthful enterprise companies have felt the squeeze most acutely, as LPs selected to allocate to these with an extended file and with whom they’ve pre-existing relationships, quite than take a danger on new managers or those that have by no means returned capital to their backers.

“Nobody will get fired for placing cash into Andreessen or Sequoia Capital,” stated Kyle Stanford, lead VC analyst at PitchBook. “When you don’t signal on [to invest in their current fund] you may lose your spot within the subsequent one: that’s what you get fired for.”
Stanford estimated the failure charge for mid-sized VCs would speed up in 2025 if the sector couldn’t discover a approach to improve its returns to LPs.
“VC is and can stay a rarefied ecosystem the place solely a choose cadre of companies constantly entry essentially the most promising alternatives,” wrote 24-year-old enterprise agency Lux Capital to its LPs in August. “The overwhelming majority of recent contributors interact in what quantities to a monetary idiot’s errand. We proceed to anticipate the extinction of as many as 30-50 per cent of VC companies.”