This text is an on-site model of Free Lunch e-newsletter. Premium subscribers can enroll right here to get the e-newsletter delivered each Thursday and Sunday. Normal subscribers can improve to Premium right here, or discover all FT newsletters
Welcome to the primary Free Lunch on Sunday. I’m Tej Parikh, the FT’s economics editorial author, occasional columnist and Alphaville blogger.
Economists, buyers and journalists all prefer to develop neat explanations to assist make sense of the worldwide financial system. On this e-newsletter I’ll take a look at them by presenting alternate narratives. Why? Properly, it’s enjoyable — and since it wards off affirmation bias.
Let’s start with Europe’s unloved equities. We’ve learn advert nauseam about how booming American shares are leaving their transatlantic counterparts within the mud, whereas European business faces a number of headwinds. It leaves a picture of Europe as a company has-been. Are the continent’s firms actually that dangerous? Listed below are some counterpoints:
The case for European shares
America’s S&P 500 is within the midst of a man-made intelligence-led growth. The “Magnificent Seven” tech shares make up round one-third of the index, and their market capitalisation surpasses your complete worth of the French, British and German bourses mixed. Tech accounts for round simply 8 per cent of the Stoxx Europe 600. AI euphoria has principally handed the continent by.
However right here’s one thing for perspective. Take Nvidia out of the S&P 500 and its whole returns underperform the eurozone’s inventory benchmark since this bull market started in late 2022.
There are a couple of interpretations of this datapoint. First, the S&P 500’s bull run principally displays a wager on AI (notably Nvidia). Second, regardless of much less tech publicity and a slow-growing financial system, eurozone shares have really carried out fairly nicely. (The “S&P 499” nonetheless consists of the six remaining “Magnificents”).
Charles Schwab’s chief world funding strategist, Jeffrey Kleintop, who flagged the above chart, additionally factors out that the eurozone’s ahead price-to-earnings ratio trades at a historic low cost to the S&P 500, creating scope for European valuations to rise additional.
Both manner, European equities clearly have an underlying enchantment. The place is it coming from? Goldman Sachs calls the continent’s dominant listed firms “the Granolas”. The acronym covers a various group of worldwide firms spanning the pharmaceutical, shopper and well being sectors. Collectively, they account for about one-fifth of the Stoxx 600.
Their efficiency in opposition to the Magnificent Seven has solely not too long ago diverged. The S&P 500 — which has round 70 per cent income publicity to the US — acquired a jolt following the election of Donald Trump.
They’re no company pushovers. Novo Nordisk produces the in-demand Wegovy weight reduction drug. LVMH is unrivalled amongst luxurious manufacturers. ASML is a world specialist in chip design. Nestlé is a world meals staple.
They didn’t finish 2024 nicely. Novo Nordisk’s newest weight problems drug had “disappointing” take a look at outcomes, LVMH is affected by weak Chinese language demand and hard macroeconomic circumstances are consuming into Nestlé’s backside line. Nonetheless, they’re established, broad companies with world publicity, low volatility and robust earnings — and a few are actually undervalued.
However Europe is greater than the Granolas. Different firms are aggressive throughout sectors, together with in tech: Glencore, Siemens Vitality, Airbus, Adidas, and Zeiss to call a couple of.
Small listed European companies additionally are likely to outperform their American counterparts. About 40 per cent of US small caps have unfavorable earnings, in contrast with simply over 10 per cent in Europe. The winner-takes-all dynamic could also be stronger within the US, the place tech behemoths suck capital and expertise away from smaller firms. (This shouldn’t detract from real scaling challenges in Europe.)
European corporates additionally rely extra on relationship-based, illiquid funding, in contrast to within the US, the place listed fairness dominates. That will encourage longer-term company governance in Europe, but additionally highlights the challenges of evaluating US and European inventory efficiency (the liquid fairness flows aren’t in the identical league).
Concerning the Trump tariff risk, it’s not all catastrophe for European firms both. Stoxx 600 teams derive solely 40 per cent of their revenues from the continent. (For measure, Frankfurt’s Dax rose shut to twenty per cent final yr, outperforming European friends, regardless of Germany’s lacklustre financial system.) A stronger greenback would additionally increase the earnings of European firms with sizeable US gross sales.
In sum, the stellar returns of the US inventory market don’t imply that European firms aren’t any good. Fairly, buyers are prepared to pay a premium to get publicity to AI (and Trump 2.0) — one that’s wanting tougher to justify.
Apart from the worth proposition, there are catalysts which will lure extra buyers to European shares: disappointing AI outcomes, decrease rates of interest in Europe, Trump dangers and additional stimulus makes an attempt in China.
And, even when its listed firms make a number of their cash outdoors Europe, there’s a home upside, too.
First, the European financial system has arguably proven agility and resilience within the face of unprecedented shocks, as an example by pivoting away from low cost Russian power. Complete manufacturing manufacturing is basically unchanged for the reason that starting of Trump’s first time period (pharma and pc gear have picked up the slack from automobile manufacturing). So-called peripheral European economies are additionally performing higher.
Then there’s the longer-term home earnings and financing outlook. Although France and Germany face political instability, the rising urgency amongst policymakers to deal with the bloc’s subdued productiveness development is at the least resulting in a extra encouraging discourse on reforms. There may be rising consensus on the necessity for a real capital markets union to drive scale, deregulation to help innovation, a extra pragmatic method to free commerce and China, a debt brake rethink in Germany, funding in digitalisation and decrease power prices. Mario Draghi’s report on European competitiveness has added momentum.
America’s monetary, modern and tech benefit is unquestionable. And whether or not Europe can really execute necessary reforms is one other matter. But the comparative surge of US shares — given entry to huge liquidity, tech experience and publicity to AI — hides strengths in Europe’s listed companies that I, at the least, had under-appreciated. The continent has various, resilient and worldwide firms with established use circumstances (whereas AI remains to be searching for one). That’s a strong platform for buyers to take advantage of — and for policymakers to construct on.
What do you assume? Message me at freelunch@ft.com or on X @tejparikh90.
Meals for thought
Age is a crucial demographic statistic. However what if we’re fascinated with it wrongly? An enchanting working paper finds that chronological age is an unreliable proxy for physiological functioning, given huge variations in how ageing unfolds throughout folks. The authors reckon our linear view of ageing might restrict the flexibility of our economies to completely harness the advantages of rising longevity.
Beneficial newsletters for you
Commerce Secrets and techniques — A must-read on the altering face of worldwide commerce and globalisation. Enroll right here
Unhedged — Robert Armstrong dissects crucial market traits and discusses how Wall Avenue’s finest minds reply to them. Enroll right here