Unlock the Editor’s Digest without spending a dime
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.
Within the wake of Brexit, Europe is understandably detest to see Britain have its cake and eat it in terms of commerce preparations. Within the case of the electrical energy market, such warning dangers leaving each side worse off.
There are good causes to favour a easy buying and selling settlement. On the peak of the 2022 European power disaster, electrical energy traded between the UK and European Union helped keep Europe’s lights on. However Brexit has created inefficiencies that value the UK an estimated £250mn in 2021.
Roughly talking, when the UK was within the EU inner power market, a pc algorithm decided probably the most cost-efficient strategy to commerce electrical energy. This nonetheless occurs within the EU. However merchants in Britain now use a extra advanced system referred to as “specific buying and selling”, the place capability on subsea cables and electrical energy technology are auctioned individually — like shopping for a product however reserving supply aside.
Another generally known as “multi-region unfastened quantity coupling” has proved as advanced as its identify suggests. A latest European working paper acknowledged this substitute system is probably not prepared earlier than June 2026, when the EU-UK Commerce and Cooperation (TCA) Settlement expires and power relations have to be reviewed.

Renewable power raises the stakes. A gaggle of nations across the North Sea — in addition to firms together with the UK’s Nationwide Grid and Belgium’s Elia Group — need to broaden energy buying and selling throughout Europe by an offshore “inexperienced power hub”. This is able to hyperlink wind farms within the North Sea through subsea cables not just to one country (as at present) but several so their output might movement to the place demand, and costs, had been increased.
However the imperfections of post-Brexit electrical energy market preparations are making some potential buyers behind the inexperienced power hub nervous, owing to the difficulties they create in forecasting doable revenues. It’s a main instance of the place pragmatism ought to trump politics on this yr’s UK-EU “reset” talks.
The temper music isn’t encouraging. Brussels is advising member states to not permit the UK deeper entry to the bloc’s electrical energy markets, the Monetary Occasions reported in December. That is regardless of an earlier plea by electrical energy firms and commerce organisations for the rewriting of the “suboptimal” post-Brexit preparations.
In fact there may be all the time a lot posturing earlier than negotiations. However some buyers consider there are possible commercial agreements that would let UK events entry the algorithms that allow smoother commerce, with out overstepping both the UK or EU’s post-Brexit consolation zones.
These ought to at the least be explored by policymakers if each side need buyers to stump as much as meet decarbonisation targets. Rules matter; protecting the lights on — sustainably — issues extra.