Unlock the Editor’s Digest free of charge
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.
Main BP shareholder Authorized and Normal plans to vote in opposition to the re-election of the corporate’s outgoing chair at subsequent week’s annual assembly, in an indication of the discontent over the oil main’s altering technique.
L&G, a prime 10 investor with a 1.8 per cent stake, mentioned it was “deeply involved” about BP’s determination to pivot again to grease and fuel and away from a radical funding in renewables, and the dearth of a vote on the topic.
“We consider that local weather change represents a financially materials and systemic long-term danger to our shoppers’ portfolios,” L&G wrote in a post on its website on Friday because it introduced plans to reject Helge Lund’s re-election. A number of smaller shareholders are planning to vote equally on the AGM on Thursday.
L&G’s place is at odds with another main shareholders together with the activist investor Elliott Funding Administration, which has pushed BP to slash spending on renewables.
The divergent views of its main traders spotlight the problem confronted by BP and different huge oil firms as they grapple with whether or not to stay with fossil fuels amid international strain to sort out local weather change, or shift to renewables, which usually have decrease, albeit steady, returns.
BP mentioned this month that Lund would step down “most definitely throughout 2026” having taken on the function in 2019 with a mandate to information the oil firm by the vitality transition and choose a brand new chief government.
His decide to steer the corporate, Bernard Looney, put in place the aggressive push in the direction of renewables, earlier than Looney was dismissed in 2023 for failing to inform the board about his relationships with colleagues.
The inexperienced technique put BP forward of rivals in efforts to shift renewable vitality, but it surely additionally attracted pushback, and in the end didn’t win sufficient shareholder help.
That left it susceptible to strain, together with from Elliott, which has constructed a nearly 5 per cent stake within the FTSE 100 firm and referred to as for sweeping modifications.
BP’s determination to desert its renewables drive was introduced in February by present chief government Murray Auchincloss.
The announcement of Lund’s exit appears to be like to be inadequate to avert a probably embarrassing AGM vote.
Asset supervisor Robeco can be planning to vote in opposition to the chair, as are fellow smaller traders within the UK pension funds Nest and Border to Coast Pensions Partnership.
Michiel van Esch, head of voting at Robeco, mentioned this month that it had “rising considerations over [BP’s] resilience by the vitality transition, and over the consistency of its method to local weather governance”.
Diandra Soobiah, director of accountable funding at Nest, which has a £30mn fairness stake within the firm, mentioned BP’s flip-flopping had “undermined confidence and belief” within the board.
Colin Baines, stewardship supervisor at Border to Coast, which has a 0.14 per cent BP stake, mentioned it was “deeply involved over the route of BP” and its failure to hunt a brand new mandate from shareholders.
L&G mentioned that whereas Lund’s plan to step down was optimistic, it needed the succession course of to “observe a clearer and swifter timeframe”.
BP mentioned it had “acquired widespread help for our reset technique and the modifications we laid out” in an “in depth programme of engagement with shareholders” for the reason that February announcement.
It added: “The constant message additionally acquired is that our focus must be on supply — executing the technique and hitting the targets we set out. That’s our precedence.”
The AGM row got here as UBS downgraded its suggestion on BP inventory from ‘purchase’ to ‘impartial’, saying market uncertainty made its technique more durable to ship.
The oil value has slipped over the previous two weeks as a consequence of considerations concerning the impact of a commerce battle between the US and China, and the Opec+ coalition’s plans to extend output from Could. Brent crude was buying and selling at about $63 per barrel on Friday, down from nearly $75 final Wednesday.
