Unlock the Editor’s Digest without cost
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.
The way forward for Thames Water is hanging within the stability after KKR, the US personal fairness agency, walked away from a £4bn rescue deal for the troubled utility that serves 16mn folks in and round London.
The following steps for the corporate, which is struggling beneath a near-£20bn debt mountain, will likely be essential because it tries to stave off short-term nationalisation.
Why did KKR stroll away?
KKR spent two months evaluating a deal to rescue Thames Water, with over 100 folks each inside and out of doors the agency engaged on an intensive due diligence course of that included a number of web site visits in and round London.
However in the long run, it withdrew from the method nearly instantly after submitting formal plans that detailed how it could steer a turnaround of Thames Water.
KKR executives in New York grew involved concerning the regulatory and political uncertainty across the UK water sector, in response to folks near the discussions, given the billions of kilos it could have to decide to a deal.
Fears mounted across the scope for continued political interference within the operating of Britain’s largest water utility, the folks added.
Even a government-arranged name over the weekend between Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s enterprise adviser Varun Chandra and KKR’s co-founder Henry Kravis was not sufficient to allay these considerations.
Thames Water was left to announce KKR’s withdrawal on Tuesday, the identical day {that a} government-led evaluate beneficial an overhaul of the system of regulation for the water sector.
Will Thames Water’s lenders now step in?
Thames Water now has to depend on its backup plan: a recapitalisation proposal from its senior lenders from whom it secured a separate £3bn emergency mortgage in March.
Holders of the corporate’s top-ranking “class A” debt additionally submitted an in depth turnaround plan to Thames Water and sector regulator Ofwat final week, which included a proposed administration staff to run the struggling utility.
Thames Water’s class A lenders account for over £17bn of its close to £20bn debt stack and embrace US hedge funds similar to Elliott Administration, in addition to UK asset managers similar to Aberdeen. The utility’s lower-ranking class B debt and additional loans at its holding firms are anticipated to be worn out in a restructuring.
The senior bondholders have indicated that they’ve commitments in place to supply billions of kilos in new fairness funding, in response to an individual near the group. They might additional strengthen the utility’s stability sheet by writing off a portion of their debt.
Whereas haircuts might be within the vary of 25 pence within the pound, the precise writedown will depend on the extent of concessions on elements similar to fines and different penalties that bondholders are capable of negotiate with Ofwat.
The emergency mortgage of as a lot as £3bn ought to give it sufficient liquidity to final into subsequent yr, though the utility has to satisfy sure situations to proceed drawing on the funding.
Will different bidders come again to the desk?
Along with the proposals from KKR and collectors, Thames Water in March acquired 5 different preliminary fairness bids from a variety of infrastructure traders.
The utility’s determination to award exclusivity to KKR rankled rival bidders similar to Hong Kong’s CK Infrastructure, which is a part of Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing’s wider CK Hutchison group. Ofwat was additionally annoyed at Thames Water’s determination to freeze different bidders out of the method, the FT has beforehand reported.
A minimum of a type of beforehand jilted bidders is now in search of a manner again into the method, with Fortress Water — a provider of water to companies — stating on Tuesday that it was “prepared, prepared and capable of help the enterprise with the requisite financing in place and might transfer shortly to supply Thames with the operational and monetary help it requires”.
Some have questioned whether or not it’s now possible for Thames Water and its advisers to reopen the equity-raise course of, nonetheless. One individual near the discussions stated it could be “very tough” to copy the intensive due diligence KKR and the collectors had carried out in a fast sufficient timeframe.
Might Thames Water be nationalised?
With Thames Water’s presumed saviour strolling away, hypothesis has grown over whether or not it may turn into the primary water firm to fall into the federal government’s particular administration regime since utilities in England and Wales had been privatised in 1989.
Below this course of, officers would appoint an administrator to take cost of the utility, with the UK authorities offering a mortgage to fund its operations and be sure that providers would maintain operating. The federal government may recoup this cash if Thames Water was then bought again to the personal sector.
Thames Water has already narrowly averted slipping right into a SAR this yr. Absent the emergency mortgage from collectors, the utility forecast its money stability may drop to as little as £39mn, the FT has beforehand reported.
Whereas the ruling Labour get together has insisted {that a} short-term renationalisation is just not within the pursuits of taxpayers, it’s coming beneath strain from rivals from each side of the political spectrum.
Charlie Maynard, a Liberal Democrat MP who spearheaded a public-interest court docket problem to Thames Water taking up extra high-interest debt, stated the corporate had reached “the tip of the street” and that it was time for the federal government to step in.
“The collectors who’ve heaped billions in debt on to the corporate ought to now pay to kind this mess out,” he stated.
Richard Tice, deputy chief of Reform UK, stated the enterprise must be plunged into SAR “for a pound”, wiping out the shareholders and bondholders.
Tice advised the Commons: “Caveat emptor.”
