Keep knowledgeable with free updates
Merely signal as much as the Local weather change myFT Digest — delivered on to your inbox.
TotalEnergies defended its technique of labelling pure fuel as a transition gasoline in promotional materials as a part of its rebranding, in a landmark trial over the declare that the French oil and fuel group had overstated its local weather commitments and misled customers.
The case is the primary in France to carry “greenwashing” allegations in opposition to an oil and fuel firm and drew a big crowd of courtroom observers, together with authorized consultants, throughout opening arguments on Thursday. It additionally highlights fossil gasoline business strikes to advertise fuel as a extra environmentally pleasant different to grease and coal.
Environmental marketing campaign teams Greenpeace, Notre affaire à tous and Pals of the Earth introduced the case alleging that TotalEnergies misled customers in communications campaigns when it modified its identify from Whole in 2021.
They allege that TotalEnergies made deceptive statements in 44 items of communication in 2021, starting from commercials to social media posts and statements on its web site. A few of the marketing campaign had said that TotalEnergies was a “main actor within the power transition” and inspired using fuel and biofuels, in keeping with the declare.
The environmental teams stated TotalEnergies’ assertion that it will attain “carbon neutrality with society” ran counter to its continued enlargement of fossil gasoline manufacturing.
In addition they criticised the promotion of pure fuel because the “least polluting” fossil gasoline, pointing to the excessive diploma of worldwide warming generated by leaks linked to the manufacturing and distribution of methane, which is the biggest element of fuel. The molecule retains 80 instances extra warmth than carbon dioxide over a shorter lifespan of 20 years, whereas CO₂ stays within the environment for lots of of years.
“Whole has deployed communication marketing campaign on fuel geared toward associating it with renewable energies, in an try and make it appear constructive, clear, fascinating power and even a ‘improbable useful resource for decarbonisation’. This impression is, as soon as once more, significantly misguided,” stated Clémentine Baldon, a lawyer representing the environmental teams.
In defending the declare, TotalEnergies argued that most of the communications referred to weren’t destined for customers, and the buyer legislation shouldn’t be utilized.
It additionally stated most of the communications have been designed to elucidate the “transformation of the group” and the rise in its manufacturing of renewable power.
TotalEnergies’ lawyer Françoise Labrousse stated: “It’s false and synthetic to accuse TotalEnergies of greenwashing . . . TotalEnergies has by no means stated that [fossil fuels] are good for the local weather.”
She added: “In line with the candidates, speaking on carbon neutrality would indicate a right away halt to all funding in new fossil gasoline tasks, together with pure fuel, which is nonetheless thought-about a transitional gasoline by all stakeholders.”
TotalEnergies’ technique since its identify change has concerned growing electrical energy era by means of renewable power and gas-powered vegetation, whereas additionally persevering with to develop its fossil gasoline manufacturing by about 3 per cent a 12 months.
The corporate has stated it goals to provide 100TWh of electrical energy generated from renewable power sources by 2030, equal to twenty per cent of its hydrocarbon manufacturing at that time.
Nevertheless, it has joined a lot of its friends in vaunting liquefied pure fuel as a cleaner gasoline.
TotalEnergies’ legal professionals referred to a Wooden Mackenzie report citing that LNG had a 60 per cent decrease warming potential than coal over a 100-year interval. It’s creating a number of giant liquefied pure fuel tasks together with in Qatar and Mozambique.
The environmental teams are in search of for TotalEnergies to change its communications, together with by putting banners on promotional materials linked to the power transition that may clarify its continued progress of fossil gasoline manufacturing.
Labrousse stated the calls for needs to be rejected by the courtroom and that the transition away from fossil fuels was an extended course of. She highlighted Greenpeace’s personal defence of its continued use of inner combustion engines on boats it makes use of for its campaigns.
“As Greenpeace recognises . . . changing [fossil fuels] takes time, is pricey and is dependent upon an evolution of present applied sciences.”
The courtroom will ship a judgment on October 23.
Local weather Capital
The place local weather change meets enterprise, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.
Are you interested by the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here
