Auto-posted whereas I am in Tokyo. Working these exams 24/7 on VPS.
I have been operating the identical Gold buying and selling prompts by three totally different AI fashions for per week. Identical account, similar knowledgeable advisor (DoIt Alpha Pulse AI), fully totally different pondering patterns.
Here is what’s really occurring with Claude, GPT-5, and Gemini after they analyze Gold.
The Check Setup (You Can Replicate This)
The Precise Immediate I am Utilizing
Present XAUUSD: [price] Final 3 H1 candles: [data] Session: [London/NY/Asian] Information right now: [economic calendar] Ought to I: Purchase/Promote/Maintain? Danger: 0.5% max Goal: Danger-reward 1:2 minimal Clarify reasoning in 50 phrases max.
Easy. Clear. Identical for all three fashions.
Testing Situations
- Demo account: $5000
- Every mannequin will get: $1500 allocation
- Identical trades provided: All three see similar setups
- Choice tracked: Even after they say “Maintain”
- Time recorded: Response pace issues
Early Observations (Not Conclusions)
GPT-5: The Overthinker
Response time: 3-5 seconds
GPT-5 retains discovering patterns which may not exist. Yesterday it mentioned:
“The three-candle formation resembles the Might 2023 reversal sample mixed with present DXY weak spot suggesting institutional accumulation nonetheless the quantity profile signifies…”
Drawback: By the point it finishes pondering, the entry is gone.
Fascinating conduct: It catches refined correlations. Observed that Gold was ignoring Greenback power as a result of bond yields had been additionally rising. That is really subtle.
Present standing:
- Alerts generated: 12
- Trades taken: 4 (others too gradual)
- Win charge: 50% (2 wins, 2 losses)
- P&L: +45 pips
Claude Opus 4.1: The Pace Dealer
Response time: 1-2 seconds
Claude makes choices FAST. Typically too quick. Its responses are like:
“Bullish. London open + help held + Greenback weak. Purchase.”
Energy: In quick markets, Claude really will get fills. Throughout Wednesday’s volatility, it was the one mannequin that caught the reversal.
Weak spot: Much less nuanced. Missed the Bond/Gold correlation fully.
Present standing:
- Alerts generated: 18
- Trades taken: 11
- Win charge: 54% (6 wins, 5 losses)
- P&L: +72 pips
Gemini 2.5: The Conservative One
Response time: 2-4 seconds (varies)
Gemini is extra cautious. Typically passes on trades the others take. Tuesday it mentioned:
“No clear edge. Recommend ready for higher setup.”
This occurs extra with Gemini than GPT or Claude.
Sudden power: Danger administration. When unsure, it typically suggests smaller positions. The one mannequin that often says “cut back threat to 0.25%” when confidence is decrease.
Minor weak spot: Typically TOO conservative, lacking good strikes whereas ready for “good” setups.
Present standing:
- Alerts generated: 9
- Trades taken: 5
- Win charge: 60% (3 wins, 2 losses)
- P&L: +38 pips
The Fascinating Discovery: They Typically Disagree
More often than not, they agree on route. However here is what occurred Thursday at London open:
Gold value: 1952.30
Setup: Break above Asian excessive
- GPT-5: “Watch for pullback to 1950”
- Claude: “Purchase now, momentum constructing”
- Gemini: “Purchase however smaller place”
Identical bullish bias, totally different approaches to entry.
Claude entered instantly. Gold ran to 1958. Claude received the very best entry.
However all three would have been worthwhile – simply totally different quantities.
What’s Truly Precious Right here
Pace vs Intelligence Commerce-off
- Want quick choices? Claude
- Want deep evaluation? GPT-5
- Want threat administration? Gemini (surprisingly)
Value Per Choice (This Week)
- GPT-5: $0.12 common
- Claude: $0.08 common
- Gemini: $0.06 common
Claude is 33% cheaper AND quicker. However GPT-5’s two wins had been larger (+40 and +35 pips vs Claude’s common of +20).
The “Confidence” Drawback
None of those fashions say “I do not know” sufficient. They at all times have an opinion, even after they should not.
I am testing including this to prompts:
If unclear, say "No edge - skip this setup" Confidence required: 70% minimal
Early outcomes: 40% fewer indicators, however higher win charge.
The Framework That is Rising
After one week, here is what I am studying:
Use Claude When:
- Information is about to hit (pace issues)
- London/NY session opens (momentum trades)
- You want fast choices on clear setups
Use GPT-5 When:
- Asian session (extra time to assume)
- Advanced correlations matter
- You’ll be able to look forward to good entries
Use Gemini When:
- You need a second opinion
- Danger administration is precedence
- Testing new methods (it is extra conservative)
What’s Truly Working Properly
Easy Operations
One factor that stunned me – DoIt Alpha Pulse AI handles all three fashions with out points:
- No API errors (correct error dealing with in-built)
- No charge restrict issues (clever request administration)
- Constant connections throughout all fashions
That is really our aggressive benefit. Whereas others battle with integration, we simply… commerce.
The Actual Variations Are Refined
The fashions are extra related than totally different. All of them:
- Catch fundamental help/resistance
- Perceive development route
- React to main information
The variations are in model, not substance:
- Claude: Direct and quick
- GPT-5: Detailed and considerate
- Gemini: Cautious and measured
The “Rationalization Tax”
Asking for reasoning provides:
- 1-2 seconds to response time
- 2x the token price
- Typically overthinking easy setups
But it surely’s price it for studying what the AI “sees”
What I am Testing Subsequent Week
Experiment 1: Consensus Buying and selling
Solely take trades the place 2 of three fashions agree. Principle: Increased conviction setups.
Experiment 2: Time-Primarily based Rotation
- Asian: Gemini (conservative for quiet markets)
- London: Claude (pace for breakouts)
- NY: GPT-5 (complexity of US session)
Experiment 3: Specialised Prompts
As an alternative of 1 immediate for all, optimize for every mannequin’s strengths:
- Claude: Brief, action-focused
- GPT-5: Embrace correlation evaluation
- Gemini: Add threat parameters
The Sincere Actuality
After one week of parallel testing, the fashions carry out equally on Gold buying and selling.
All of them catch the plain strikes. The variations are marginal – possibly 5-10% efficiency variance. The talent is not choosing the “proper” AI – it is writing higher prompts.
That is why DoIt Alpha Pulse AI helps all of them. Not as a gimmick, however as a result of totally different market situations want several types of pondering.
Your Homework Whereas I am in Japan
If in case you have DoIt Alpha Pulse AI, do this:
- Run the identical setup by totally different fashions
- Doc after they disagree
- Monitor which one was proper
- Share findings
By the point I am again, we’ll have crowd-sourced information on which mannequin works finest for what.
The Questions I am Investigating in Tokyo
Assembly with quant merchants right here who’ve been utilizing AI longer:
- How do they deal with mannequin disagreement?
- What’s their strategy to consensus?
- How do they optimize for latency from Asia?
- Are there fashions we’re not contemplating?
Present Scoreboard (Week 1)
Pace Champion: Claude (1-2 seconds)
Accuracy Chief: Gemini (60% win charge however small pattern)
Complexity Grasp: GPT-5 (catches refined patterns)
Value Winner: Gemini ($0.06/choice)
Reliability: Claude (most constant)
However bear in mind – that is one week of information. Not conclusions, simply observations.
The Actual Worth of This Experiment
It is not about discovering the “finest” mannequin. It is about understanding that AI buying and selling technique is not one-size-fits-all.
Your buying and selling model, the pairs you commerce, your threat tolerance – all of them have an effect on which AI mannequin fits you.
That is why the immediate is extra vital than the mannequin. A fantastic immediate on Claude beats a nasty immediate on GPT-5 each time.
Need to run your personal AI mannequin experiments?
Get DoIt Alpha Pulse AI – Now $397
Helps all main AI fashions. Swap between them immediately. Discover what works for YOUR buying and selling.
P.S. – Nonetheless in Tokyo. These fashions are operating 24/7 on my VPS. Once I test in from my lodge, I see Claude and GPT-5 arguing about whether or not 1958 is resistance or help. Even AIs cannot agree on fundamental TA.
P.P.S. – In the event you’re testing fashions your self, doc every little thing. The patterns solely emerge with information, not hunches.
