Keep knowledgeable with free updates
Merely signal as much as the Oil & Gasoline trade myFT Digest — delivered on to your inbox.
Greenpeace has been ordered to pay lots of of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in damages over its protests towards an oil pipeline in North Dakota, a choice that the environmental marketing campaign group mentioned might bankrupt its US operations.
A nine-person jury in Mandan, North Dakota, dominated in favour of Texas-based pipeline operator, Power Switch, on Wednesday, discovering Greenpeace and its US entities chargeable for defamation, conspiracy, and bodily harm to its Dakota Entry Pipeline.
The eight-year legal battle has been carefully watched as a take a look at of US free speech legal guidelines. Environmental and civil rights legal professionals mentioned the decision was a setback without cost speech beneath US President Donald Trump, who has championed the oil and gasoline sector and focused political opponents and the media.
The lawsuit stemmed from Greenpeace’s participation in protests towards the development of the pipeline in 2016, which drew greater than 100,000 protesters and remodeled the sleepy metropolis of Mandan right into a battleground over indigenous rights and environmental protections.
In 2017, Power Switch sued Greenpeace and its US entities in federal courtroom, in search of lots of of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in damages. After the case was dismissed, it filed an analogous lawsuit in a North Dakota state courtroom, the place a verdict was delivered on Wednesday after a three-week trial.
The ruling follows a renewed push from the fossil gasoline trade to make use of the authorized system to advance initiatives and silence opposition. Since 2017, almost two dozen states have moved to criminalise protests close to pipelines, in line with the Worldwide Heart for Not-for-Revenue Legislation.
Greenpeace mentioned the ruling in North Dakota would price the organisation greater than $660mn in damages. The organisation mentioned it could enchantment towards the ruling and has also sued Power Switch within the Netherlands in a take a look at of recent EU freedom of speech guidelines.
“The combat towards Huge Oil isn’t over at the moment, and we all know that the reality and the regulation are on our facet,” mentioned Kristin Casper, normal counsel for Greenpeace.
The $3.8bn Dakota Entry Pipeline was first proposed in 2014 to move crude from North Dakota’s prolific Bakken basin to Illinois. Tensions started in 2016 when members of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe arrange camps protesting towards the mission, fearing it endangered their consuming water and violated their sovereignty.
The corporate, whose billionaire co-founder Kelcy Warren is a outstanding Trump donor, argued Greenpeace was instrumental to the protests, chargeable for spreading misinformation, coaching hundreds of protesters, donating cash and provides.
A mix of delays, safety measures in response to the protests, and reputational and bodily harm had price the corporate hundreds of thousands of {dollars}, it argued.
Power Switch on Wednesday mentioned it was “happy” with the decision, calling the end result a “win” for North Dakota and for “all law-abiding People who perceive the distinction between the proper to free speech and breaking the regulation”.
Greenpeace and civil rights legal professionals had known as the Power Switch declare a “strategic lawsuit towards public participation” or Slapp, a time period describing authorized actions filed by highly effective entities to silence critics and exhaust their sources.
Greenpeace had petitioned unsuccessfully to vary the venue of the North Dakota proceedings, arguing it was unimaginable to get a good trial within the county the place the protests occurred and the place many residents have ties to the fossil gasoline trade.
Mandan, the place the courthouse is situated, is house to North Dakota’s largest refinery, and Power Switch donated $3mn in 2019 to improve a neighborhood library and parks.
“This was the engineered victory Power Switch sought they usually obtained it,” mentioned Scott Badenoch, a visiting legal professional on the Environmental Legislation Institute. “The depth of chilling that this verdict will yield is difficult to understate.”
Local weather Capital
The place local weather change meets enterprise, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.
Are you interested in the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here
