This text is an on-site model of our Ethical Cash publication. Premium subscribers can join right here to get the publication delivered thrice per week. Normal subscribers can improve to Premium right here, or discover all FT newsletters.
Go to our Ethical Cash hub for all the newest ESG information, opinion and evaluation from across the FT
Welcome again.
Thus far, considerations about “greenwashing” have targeted closely on advertising and marketing aimed toward retail shoppers. In any case, savvy company consumers can inform the distinction between inexperienced fluff and correctly licensed sustainability claims, proper? Suppose once more . . .
Greenwashing
Even firms are prone to shaky inexperienced advertising and marketing
One product has a number of certificates from globally recognised organisations, testifying to its sustainability credentials. The opposite has nothing however slick branding to again up its maker’s inexperienced claims.
Which might you quite purchase?
For the individuals dealing with procurement at European firms, the reply may be very usually the second possibility — in accordance with an attention-grabbing new examine, scheduled for publication in an upcoming version of the journal Nature Scientific Stories, that raises troubling questions on company susceptibility to greenwashing.
The experiment
Teachers Owais Khan and Andreas Hinterhuber, on the Venice College of Administration, carried out a survey with 465 buying managers at EU-based firms.
Half of the managers have been proven a pitch for workplace paper with voluminous however unsubstantiated inexperienced advertising and marketing claims about recycled materials and carbon neutrality, together with a large-font declare to be “100% Sustainable”.
The others have been proven a pitch for the same paper, with minimal advertising and marketing language however with badges from each the Forest Stewardship Council and the Sustainable Forestry Initiative, two outstanding certification schemes for sustainable practices within the paper business.
The group proven the primary pitch stated they’d pay, on common, 15 per cent extra for the paper than for a typical different, attributable to its enthusiastically offered however uncertified inexperienced claims. The group proven the licensed product stated they’d pay solely 12.9 per cent extra.

In different phrases, company buying managers appear to provide no extra weight to unbiased sustainability certification than they do to slick advertising and marketing claims — if something, barely much less.
There was the same story in electronics: the primary group was prepared to pay 17 per cent extra for a laptop computer bearing uncertified inexperienced claims; the second, solely 15.6 per cent extra for one with inexperienced certifications.
In protecting gloves, the competition between the licensed and uncertified merchandise resulted in a useless warmth, with buying managers prepared to pay a 15 per cent premium for every — regardless that the licensed product carried no fewer than seven completely different inexperienced stamps of approval.
The takeaways
What classes may be taken from this? Company efforts to enhance environmental requirements do seem like having a major affect on the behaviour of buying managers, who’re apparently prepared to pay premiums exceeding 10 per cent for inexperienced merchandise. The difficulty is that these managers seem ill-equipped to establish which so-called inexperienced merchandise stand as much as scrutiny.
A part of the issue is a proliferation of inexperienced labelling schemes — greater than 400, in accordance with the examine authors — and the shortage of standardisation between them. A consolidation of lots of these schemes may effectively be worthwhile.
Regulation may have a giant position to play. The EU’s Inexperienced Claims Directive has been within the works since 2023, prompted by considerations that greater than half of inexperienced advertising and marketing is probably deceptive. The brand new guidelines would require firms making inexperienced claims to again them up with stable proof, and to have them independently verified. However the directive continues to be below negotiation, and would nonetheless must be transposed into nationwide regulation as soon as agreed. In a lot of the remainder of the world, governments have been even slower to crack down on this difficulty.
For now, imprecise inexperienced advertising and marketing claims are set to stay a function of the procurement panorama. Meaning firms have to construct clear insurance policies on what sort of product certification they worth, and to coach their buying managers accordingly.
Good reads
Perverse incentives Delivery group AP Møller-Maersk has claimed {that a} proposed new carbon buying and selling plan for delivery may encourage the sector to make use of extra fossil gasoline gasoline.
Unwell winds How can we forestall sick individuals from falling out of the workforce for good?
Lobbying push The UK authorities is below business stress to drop a windfall tax on oil and gasoline.
Really useful newsletters for you
Full Disclosure — Conserving you updated with the most important worldwide authorized information, from the courts to regulation enforcement and the enterprise of regulation. Enroll right here
Power Supply — Important power information, evaluation and insider intelligence. Enroll right here