Unlock the Editor’s Digest without spending a dime
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly e-newsletter.
What might be extra relatable than a vacation spending blunder? Final December, US division retailer chain Saks acquired rival Neiman Marcus for $2.7bn. To assist fund the deal, it issued $2.2bn in bonds. And already, the mixed enterprise has discovered itself struggling to satisfy a $120mn curiosity fee due on Monday.
Saks has responded in a no much less relatable manner: by going deeper into debt. Late on Friday it introduced a fancy $600mn fundraising that gives some respiration room. However the US retail sector is floundering, and in attempting to dig itself out of a gap, Saks has made a few of its collectors very sad.
Usually when an organization borrows cash, buyers who present the identical class of capital — say, collaborating in a given bond situation — get equal therapy. Saks, although, has opted to divide and conquer. A slim majority of bondholders agreed to place up a lot of the brand new cash. However in return they get to carry the corporate’s most senior-ranked debt, that means they will get high therapy in any chapter. A few of this investor group’s present bonds might be transformed into the brand new sort too.
Not so for the minority, who’re largely left with their present bonds pushed additional down the pecking order. This type of unequal therapy has a reputation in debt restructuring circles: “creditor-on-creditor violence”.
Saks presumably bets the bruised emotions might be value it ultimately. The deal is actually useful to Richard Baker, Saks’ billionaire proprietor, since restructuring avoids a chapter during which his fairness might show nugatory. Baker is already busy: he additionally owns Hudson’s Bay, a Canadian division retailer retailer in the midst of chapter proceedings.
The lossmaking Saks thinks it might, with value cuts and varied accounting changes, make $1bn of ebitda in 2026. That means an organization value just below $6bn, valued on the identical a number of at which luxurious rival Nordstrom was just lately acquired. However with greater than $5bn of group debt, even on this rosy situation the fairness seems to have little worth.
Retail is especially vulnerable to kick the can workout routines the place firms use their mental property, actual property and stock as safety to lift capital when in dire straits. And nonetheless, lenders to the sector get burned. An evaluation from Fitch Scores discovered that 34 of 79 latest retail bankruptcies resulted in liquidations as an alternative of reorganisations, 4 instances the speed throughout all sectors.
Saks can pit collectors towards each other partly as a result of its bonds got here with pretty free circumstances, as usually occurs when financing is raised in periods of market complacency. That incentivises debtors to attempt varied stunts so as to keep away from chapter. However as with all credit-fuelled vacation splurge, the invoice finally comes due. Saks has six months till its subsequent curiosity fee. A less-than-merry Christmas looms.
sujeet.indap@ft.com
