Stablecoins pose an actual danger to financial institution deposits each globally and in america, in keeping with a brand new report by Customary Chartered analysts.
The delay of the US CLARITY Act — a invoice proposing to prohibit interest on stablecoin holdings — is a “reminder that stablecoins pose a danger to banks,” Geoff Kendrick, world head of digital property analysis at Customary Chartered, mentioned in a report on Tuesday seen by Cointelegraph.
“We estimate that US financial institution deposits will lower by one-third of stablecoin market cap,” the analyst mentioned, referring to a $301.4 billion market of US dollar-pegged stablecoins, as measured by CoinGecko.
Customary Chartered’s findings add to the CLARITY Act debate amid corporations like Coinbase withdrawing support, and Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire dismissing fears of stablecoin-driven bank runs as “completely absurd.”
Regional US banks most uncovered, funding banks least
Within the report, Kendrick highlighted web curiosity margin (NIM) earnings — a key profitability metric that measures the distinction between curiosity earned and curiosity paid, divided by common interest-earning property.
“NIM earnings as a proportion of whole financial institution income is probably the most correct measure of this danger as a result of deposits drive NIM, and so they danger leaving banks because of stablecoin adoption,” Kendrick mentioned.
“We discover that regional US banks are extra uncovered on this measure than diversified banks and funding banks, that are least uncovered,” he added, naming Huntington Bancshares, M&T Financial institution, Truist Monetary and CFG Financial institution as probably the most uncovered.
The quantity of US financial institution deposits in danger from stablecoin adoption relies on a variety of elements, together with the situation of issuer’s deposits, home versus overseas demand and wholesale versus retail demand, the analyst famous.
Tether and Circle maintain simply 0.02% and 14.5% of reserves in financial institution deposits
If stablecoin issuers maintain a big share of their deposits within the banking system the place the stablecoins are issued, the strain for financial institution runs needs to be decreased, Kendrick wrote, including:
“The concept is that if a deposit leaves a financial institution to enter a stablecoin, however the stablecoin issuer holds all of its reserves in financial institution deposits, there could be no web deposit discount.”
Nonetheless, Tether and Circle — the operators of the world’s two largest stablecoins, USDt (USDT) and USDC (USDC) — maintain simply 0.02% and 14.5% of their reserves in financial institution deposits, respectively, Kendrick reported, including: “So little or no re-depositing is occurring.”
Relating to home versus overseas demand, Kendrick concluded that home demand drains native financial institution deposits, whereas overseas demand doesn’t.
Associated: BofA CEO flags $6T bank deposit risk from stablecoin yield
“We estimate that round two-thirds of stablecoin demand comes from rising markets at current, so one-third comes from developed markets,” he wrote.
He added that, primarily based on a projected $2 trillion market cap, about $500 billion of deposits may go away developed-market banks by end-2028, whereas roughly $1 trillion may exit emerging-market banks.
Kendrick additionally mentioned Customary Chartered nonetheless expects the CLARITY Act to go by the top of the primary quarter of 2026. He famous that bank-run dangers aren’t restricted to stablecoins, but in addition stem from the “inevitable” growth of real-world assets.
Journal: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026
