Unlock the Editor’s Digest totally free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.
The boss of the world’s largest publicly listed oil tanker operator has accused the UN maritime rule-setting physique of “sleeping behind the wheel” over the rising darkish fleet of unregulated vessels, saying it’s “solely a query of time” earlier than a big catastrophe takes place.
Lars Barstad, chief government of Frontline, additionally criticised European governments for failing to implement guidelines meant to curtail buying and selling in Russian oil, saying they have been nervous about forcing up vitality costs.
The variety of darkish fleet vessels has grown to a few fifth of the world fleet after Russian-linked house owners purchased up lots of of ageing ships to avoid western nations’ curbs on the nation’s oil commerce.
The potential for catastrophe was illustrated in July when the Hafnia Nile, a tanker operated by Singapore-based Hafnia, collided with the Ceres I, a darkish fleet vessel carrying Iranian oil, in waters off Malaysia.
In response to a subsequent US Treasury sanctions notice in opposition to the Ceres I’s house owners, on the time of the collision the vessel’s radar system was broadcasting an inaccurate location — a typical tactic for darkish fleet ships making an attempt to hide their actions.
Darkish fleet vessels, which carry oil from Iran and Venezuela in addition to Russia, are typically the property of offshore corporations whose possession is unclear and infrequently lack satisfactory insurance coverage. They’re continuously registered underneath the flags of nations that do little to implement guidelines about common security inspections.

Barstad mentioned he was “very, very involved” concerning the development of the darkish fleet, which he mentioned had incentivised quite a lot of “lawbreaking operators” to make an “insane amount of cash”.
He added that the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the UN physique, was doing too little to make sure enforcement of its security and environmental guidelines.
“All these vessels . . . are buying and selling outdoors the IMO framework,” Barstad mentioned. “They’ve been sleeping behind the wheel now for fairly a while in respect of tankers.”
There had been stories of different, unconfirmed incidents apart from the Ceres I collision, Barstad added. “I’m very shocked we’ve not had extra incidents like this,” he mentioned. “I feel it’s solely a query of time till we get a giant one.”
A vessel such because the Ceres I — which was carrying 2mn barrels of crude oil — could possibly be cut up in two in a future incident, he mentioned.
“That might be within the setting a much bigger drawback,” Barstad mentioned. “It might probably occur any day — after which the most important drawback is that, if that occurs, no one will know who truly owns the ship or the cargo.”
Shipowners that complied with the laws, resembling Frontline, have been going through disadvantages as a result of so many others have been working with decrease prices in unregulated darkish fleets, Barstad added. He mentioned that mirrored politicians’ lack of willingness to implement the sanctions.
“Politicians have determined to not take the political dangers,” Barstad mentioned, including that he thought many feared increased vitality costs if oil from Russia, Iran and Venezuela have been really excluded from worldwide markets.
There have been persistent ideas that nations resembling Denmark — which controls the doorway to the Baltic — and nations by the English Channel ought to examine and take into custody tankers crusing previous their coasts with out correct insurance coverage.
Barstad declined to single out specific states however mentioned: “It appears extraordinarily halfhearted the best way enforcement has been carried out. A tricky place needs to be taken if one is severe about this.”
The IMO mentioned in response to Barstad’s criticism that its normal meeting handed a decision in late 2023 calling on member states to take harder motion over fraudulent registration of ships and to step up inspections of vessels in port.
It additionally mentioned member states had the accountability to make sure that vessels flying their flag adopted the required guidelines and to make sure ships visiting their ports did so.