This text is an on-site model of our Unhedged e-newsletter. Premium subscribers can enroll right here to get the e-newsletter delivered each weekday. Customary subscribers can improve to Premium right here, or discover all FT newsletters
Good morning. Jay Powell was efficiently boring in his testimony earlier than the Senate yesterday. The Fed is in no hurry to chop charges, it should deal with the information, it should stay impartial. Quick-term charges barely twitched. Had been solely the remainder of the world as predictable. E-mail us: robert.armstrong@ft.com and aiden.reiter@ft.com.
What gold is telling us now?
Gold staged a tremendous rally between February and October 2024; the value rose by greater than a 3rd. This adopted a interval of greater than three years when the disaster asset extraordinaire went sideways, regardless of a roller-coaster journey in rates of interest and threat belongings. Why gold rallied simply when it lastly did stays barely mysterious however appears to should do with a structural shift in world demand, notably from central banks.
Unhedged admits to having felt a little bit of aid — for mental slightly than monetary causes — when gold began buying and selling sideways once more in October. A steady gold worth meant one much less complicated factor to consider in a puzzling market thrown into dysfunction by the US presidential election. That hiatus is over, nevertheless. In 2025 gold has surged one other 10 per cent, crashing although the all-time excessive it set three months in the past.

What does this sign about world markets?
The trivial clarification for why gold (or any asset) goes up is that extra folks need to purchase it. And there may be proof of sturdy demand for gold just lately. The Chinese language central financial institution elevated its gold holdings for the third straight month in January. And, in accordance with the World Gold Council, inflows into bullion-backed ETFs had been $3bn final month, a powerful month after notable weak point in November and December. European gold funds took in $3.4bn, their highest influx in virtually three years. China has good cause to diversify its reserves away from the greenback, and Europe is ready for the US tariff hammer to fall. Increased gold demand is sensible in each locations.
Simply as necessary, there may be completely commonplace macroeconomic logic at work for the reason that gold worth actually began to maneuver in mid-January. Actual rates of interest (as proxied by inflation-adjusted 10-year Treasury yields) have fallen by 25 foundation factors — so the chance value for proudly owning gold has been falling. The greenback has weakened, too, offering additional worth help, given the gold is priced in {dollars}. To the extent that these components clarify what’s going on, the thriller isn’t gold. It’s why the “Trump commerce”, which requires a stronger greenback and better long-term charges, has gone into reverse just lately.

What explains the reversal within the greenback and in actual charges, which had been steadily rising since Trump’s re-election started to look probably again in September? Tactically, that is most likely the central query in markets proper now. There are a minimum of three doable explanations. It might be that markets see US financial development slowing, for causes involving the enterprise cycle, financial coverage or Trump’s fiscal/financial insurance policies. Alternatively, it might be that the greenback and actual charges rose in anticipation of swinging US tariffs (which might naturally help each), however the market now thinks the Trump administration was bluffing about that. Lastly, the explanation might be technical. Possibly the Trump trades received overcrowded and they’re taking a breather earlier than surging again to life. Maybe a mixture of all three explanations is at work. We most likely received’t know the actual combine till US tariff coverage turns into clearer over the subsequent few months.
Focus in rising market indices
When world fairness markets are dominated by the US, and the US fairness markets are dominated by huge expertise shares, the most effective argument for an allocation to rising market shares is diversification. Sadly, because the FT’s EM correspondent Joseph Cotterill identified to us, EM indices have grow to be very top-heavy, too.
Tech — and one tech firm particularly, TSMC — has powered development within the extra developed “rising” markets comparable to China, Taiwan and South Korea. Right here is the weighting of the highest 10 equities MSCI rising markets index in 2019 and 2025, with tech corporations in pink:

TSMC is now greater than 10 per cent of the index, and new tech names are contributing important weights. In MSCI’s rising markets ex-China index, TSMC is 15 per cent of the index, and tech corporations make up greater than 20 per cent. This can be a pattern in country-specific indices, too; in accordance with a report from Morningstar, indices for Brazil, Taiwan, Korea and India have grow to be extra concentrated round their home mega caps, usually in tech.
There’s additionally the problem of nation focus. Here’s a chart from Morningstar, displaying how India and Taiwan have taken up an increasing number of of its EM index since 2019:

Tech focus makes EM indices a much less efficient diversifier in a worldwide portfolio. TSMC, Tencent and Samsung rely closely on the identical AI narrative that drives the Magnificent 7. And stockpicking is troublesome in concentrated markets when the most important shares have momentum. The alternatives are to hug the index or tackle important profession threat.
All that focus comes with some upside, although, within the type of development and valuation. Whereas EM corporations are likely to have smaller US exposures than their developed market friends, most of the huge EM tech corporations — notably TSMC and Samsung — do get a big share of their revenues from America. A couple of weeks again, we mentioned whether or not proudly owning EU or UK shares may present low-cost publicity to US development, utilizing a worth/earnings-growth evaluation — the “peg” ratio. The same train makes the EM indices appear like a reasonable approach so as to add development publicity:

Rising market equities are unstable. They require cautious handing. However at a second when development is often unavailable at an affordable worth, EM stays attention-grabbing, regardless of the focus drawback.
(Reiter)
One good learn
Immigration and lactation.
FT Unhedged podcast

Can’t get sufficient of Unhedged? Take heed to our new podcast, for a 15-minute dive into the newest markets information and monetary headlines, twice per week. Make amends for previous editions of the e-newsletter right here.
Really useful newsletters for you
Due Diligence — High tales from the world of company finance. Join right here
Free Lunch — Your information to the worldwide financial coverage debate. Join right here