Jes Staley had had sufficient. He advised Barclays chair Nigel Higgins he was contemplating resigning from his function as chief govt of the British lender.
It was December 2019. Staley had learnt that the UK monetary regulator, which had obtained a trove of emails from his former employer JPMorgan Chase, would launch an investigation into whether or not he had misled Barclays and the Monetary Conduct Authority about his relationship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who had died by suicide in a jail cell 4 months earlier.
“I can’t undergo this once more,” Staley advised a colleague, in response to individuals with information of the dialog. The American investment banker introduced in to revive Barclays’ fortunes in 2015, had already had a run-in with the watchdog in 2018. The prospect of one other FCA probe appeared an excessive amount of however he resolved to see it via.
That call set off a sequence of occasions which have culminated in a high-stakes authorized battle set to start in London on Monday. Staley will search to clear his title and overturn a 2023 ban imposed by the FCA that prohibits him from holding senior positions in monetary companies. The episode value him his job anyway; it was the first time the watchdog banned a CEO of a serious British financial institution for actions taken on his watch.
In difficult the ban and fantastic, Staley will draw a few of the Metropolis of London’s strongest people, in addition to his former colleagues, again to a case they’ve lengthy been keen to depart behind. Financial institution of England governor Andrew Bailey, Sam Woods, head of the Prudential Regulation Authority, and Higgins will all give proof, as will Staley himself.
The case will inevitably generate headlines. The UK’s Prince Andrew, prolific fraudster Bernard Madoff, former US treasury secretary Lawrence Summers and Lord Peter Mandelson, the UK’s new ambassador to the US, are all referenced in the court filings; a sign of the nexus of energy and excessive society that Epstein exploited.
Curiosity in Epstein, in the meantime, has been revived by a promise by the US Division of Justice to launch declassified data this week pertaining to the lifeless financier.
The court docket case in London will dredge up particulars of Staley’s ties with one of the infamous sexual predators in latest reminiscence, prompting associates and former colleagues to ask why Staley would convey it.
“[Staley] has a household, a pleasant home within the Hamptons, a yacht and extra money than god,” stated one former Barclays colleague who was near the banker. “Let it go.”
A few of Staley’s former associates have speculated that that is revenge for the way in which he was handled by UK regulators, who individually fined him in 2018 over his makes an attempt to unmask an nameless whistleblower.
“He’s going to try to embarrass a few of the individuals who had been concerned on the time and can attempt to put a little bit of muck on everybody,” stated a former Barclays board member. “But when he known as me and requested what I believed, I’d positively advise him to drop it.”
Staley might nonetheless do this earlier than Monday. However as issues stand, he’s out to make a degree — even when it comes at nice private and monetary value. He has enlisted the assistance of Lord David Pannick KC, one of many UK’s most skilled and costly barristers, whose purchasers have included Queen Elizabeth II and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
A lawyer for Staley declined to remark.
Two key questions lie on the coronary heart of the case: whether or not Staley deliberately misled Barclays — and thereby regulators — about his relationship with Epstein; and whether or not communications between the 2 continued after he grew to become Barclays CEO in December 2015.
Staley, who left Barclays in November 2021 after the FCA provisionally discovered he had acted “recklessly and with a scarcity of integrity,” will search to show that his destiny was sealed lengthy earlier than the regulator got here to its conclusion. He argues in court docket filings that minds had been already made up by the point of a vital assembly throughout that fateful December of 2019 between Bailey, who was then FCA head, Woods, Higgins and Mark Carney, then BoE governor and now a contender to be Canada’s next prime minister.
That’s when the 4 males mentioned a letter Higgins had despatched to the FCA during which he wrote that Staley had confirmed to the financial institution “he didn’t have an in depth relationship” with Epstein, and that they final communicated “nicely earlier than he joined Barclays in 2015”.
The regulators, who had been in possession of a cache of emails they believed confirmed in any other case, stated they’d been misled and would launch an investigation; the information of which prompted Staley to supply his resignation over Christmas 2019.
Higgins, in his debrief to Barclays’ board, stated he had been left with the impression that three of the UK’s strongest monetary regulators felt Staley’s place was untenable, in response to individuals with information of the briefing.
Staley is satisfied the FCA “received him fired and disgraced with out the proof to again that” so the difficulty is “very private for him,” stated a former director on the Barclays board.
The FCA’s case in opposition to Staley is summarised by its assertion in a pre-trial submitting that he “might and may have averted the inclusion of the deceptive statements” within the letter the financial institution despatched to the regulator.
“Staley had the chance to appropriate these deceptive statements within the letter, however failed to take action,” the FCA stated.
The FCA is counting on over 1,000 emails exchanged between the 2 males over eight years up till October 2015, during which Staley refers to Epstein as “household” and “one in all our deepest associates,” as proof that the pair had been shut.
There are additionally exchanges the place Staley plans visits to the late financier’s personal island and now notorious emails between the 2 males referring to Disney characters.
“That was enjoyable. Say hello to Snow White,” Staley wrote in an electronic mail to Epstein in July 2010, to which he obtained a response saying “[W]hat character would you want subsequent?”
“Magnificence and the Beast,” Staley replied.
There are additionally emails associated to skilled issues, most notably Epstein’s makes an attempt to put in Staley as Barclays chief govt in 2012 by leveraging his relationship with Mandelson.
However Barclays didn’t wish to have one other pugnacious American funding banker within the job so quickly after Bob Diamond’s defenestration by the Financial institution of England over the Libor fixing scandal; an episode indicative of the fractious relationship the financial institution has lengthy had with the British institution and regulators.
Staley has argued that “the overwhelming majority” of his correspondence with Epstein was for enterprise functions and that he was not “distinctive in utilising his reference to Epstein to additional the movement of data which was of worth to his employers.”
The 68-year-old will even juxtapose the seriousness of his punishment — a disgraceful finish to a 40-year profession in finance — with the allegedly obscure request from the FCA that Barclays write down the way it had “glad themselves that there was no impropriety within the relationship”.
Bob Hoyt, Barclays’ group common counsel on the time was accountable for drafting the letter. Staley claims he questioned the letter’s characterisation of his relationship with Epstein as “not shut” to Hoyt.
Staley will even need to reply allegations that he remained in touch with Epstein after he grew to become Barclays CEO via an middleman: his daughter Alexa Staley.
Epstein despatched emails to Staley’s daughter for nearly a 12 months beginning in March 2016.
In a single, despatched shortly after Donald Trump received the US election in 2016, Epstein asks Staley’s daughter whether or not he would wish to be US treasury secretary. She says she has requested her father and that he stated “not but, however thanks”.
Staley has stated he doesn’t bear in mind speaking to his daughter about her exchanges with Epstein, citing the “passage of time” and “his skilled commitments”.
The FCA, Financial institution of England, Higgins and Barclays declined to remark.
A lot of this soiled laundry has already been aired via litigation involving JPMorgan within the US, the place Staley labored till 2013. The financial institution took on Epstein as a consumer of its personal financial institution in 2000. It saved him on after his indictment in Florida on fees of soliciting minors in 2008.
JPMorgan has settled two lawsuits over its dealings with Epstein, together with one in opposition to Staley, however denied any duty for his crimes.
However those that know Staley say his willingness to struggle the FCA is misguided, whatever the deserves of his case.
“You’ll be able to contest it, you may struggle it however all that is nonetheless going to be on the market,” stated one one who knew Staley. “Even should you win, on the finish of the day, you’re not going to get one other job and nobody goes to vary their minds.”
