US President Donald Trump signed into legislation laws on Monday nicknamed the Take It Down Act, which requires platforms to take away nonconsensual situations of “intimate visible depiction” inside 48 hours of receiving a request. Corporations that take longer or don’t comply in any respect might be topic to penalties of roughly $50,000 per violation.
The legislation obtained help from tech companies like Google, Meta, and Microsoft and can go into impact inside the subsequent 12 months. Enforcement can be left as much as the Federal Commerce Fee, which has the facility to penalize firms for what it deems unfair and misleading enterprise practices. Different nations, together with India, have enacted comparable rules requiring swift removals of sexually specific pictures or deepfakes. Delays can result in content material spreading uncontrollably throughout the online; Microsoft, for instance, took months to behave in a single high-profile case.
However free speech advocates are involved {that a} lack of guardrails within the Take It Down Act might permit dangerous actors to weaponize the coverage to power tech firms to unjustly censor on-line content material. The brand new legislation is modeled on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which requires web service suppliers to expeditiously take away materials that somebody claims is infringing on their copyright. Corporations may be held financially responsible for ignoring legitimate requests, which has motivated many companies to err on the aspect of warning and preemptively take away content material earlier than a copyright dispute has been resolved.
For years, fraudsters have abused the DMCA takedown course of to get content material censored for causes that don’t have anything to do with copyright infringements. In some circumstances, the knowledge is unflattering or belongs to trade opponents that they wish to hurt. The DMCA does embrace provisions that permit fraudsters to be held financially liable after they make false claims. Final 12 months, for instance, Google secured a default judgment towards two people accused of orchestrating a scheme to suppress opponents within the T-shirt trade by submitting frivolous requests to take away tons of of hundreds of search outcomes.
Fraudsters who could have feared the penalties of abusing DMCA might discover Take It Down a much less dangerous pathway. The Take It Down Act doesn’t embrace a sturdy deterrence provision, requiring solely that takedown requestors train “good religion,” with out specifying penalties for performing in dangerous religion. In contrast to the DMCA, the brand new legislation additionally doesn’t define an appeals course of for alleged perpetrators to problem what they think about misguided removals. Critics of the regulation say it ought to have exempted sure content material, together with materials that may be considered as being within the public’s curiosity to stay on-line.
One other concern is that the 48-hour deadline specified within the Take It Down Act could restrict how a lot firms can vet requests earlier than making a call about whether or not to approve them. Free speech teams contend that would result in the erasure of content material properly past nonconsensual “visually intimate depictions,” and invite abuse by the identical sorts of fraudsters who took benefit of the DMCA.
